Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:05 AM

Niti Aayog's proposals on Simultaneous Elections: Assault on Democracy

The  prime minister and the BJP are keen to enforce simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and the state legislative assemblies. The president, in his address to parliament, has called for a sustained debate on simultaneous elections, so that political parties can arrive at a consensus on the issue.

The case for simultaneous elections is that frequent elections impose a huge expenditure on the exchequer.  It is also argued that the `Model Code of Conduct’, which comes into force before the elections, impedes development activities.  Further, a series of elections every year is said to be a heavy burden on human resources. 

The arguments against enforcing simultaneous elections for parliament and the state legislatures are not technical in nature, or, that it is impractical.  The basic objection to the concept is that it is fundamentally anti-democratic and strikes at the root of the parliamentary democratic system.

To hold the Lok Sabha and state assembly elections together would require tampering with the Constitutional scheme of accountability of the government to the legislature.  Under the Constitution, if a government is voted out on a no-confidence motion, or, loses a vote on a Money Bill, it is bound to resign and if no alternative government can be formed, the House is dissolved and a mid-term election held.  There is no fixity of tenure enshrined in the Constitution either for the Lok Sabha, or, for the state assemblies.

In order to bring about simultaneous elections, there are various suggestions being made to amend the Constitution. One of the suggestions made by a discussion paper released by the Niti Aayog is that if the dissolution of the Lok Sabha cannot be avoided and the remainder of the term of the Lok Sabha is not long, then a provision can be made for the president to carry out the administration of the country, on the aid and advice of a council of ministers to be appointed by him/her till the next House is constituted.  This outrageous proposal would make the president head the executive.  This is bringing an executive president through the back door. 

The other corollory is that if, at the time of the dissolution of the House, the remaining period is long, then fresh elections would be held and the term of the House would be only for the rest of the remaining period, ie, if the dissolution of the House takes place say after two years of its term, then, the election will be held for a three year term.  So, actually, there will be more frequent Lok Sabha elections, which defeats the purpose, for which simultaneous elections are being advocated. 

Similarly, in the case of state legislatures, if there is a dissolution after a major part of the term is over, the governor would run the state for the rest of the term of the House.  This again would mean central rule.

The other way proposed for aligning the Lok Sabha and state assembly elections is to extend the life of some of the assemblies, or, to shorten the tenure of some.  For instance, the Niti Aayog paper proposes reduction in the term of the Tripura Assembly by 15 months at one extreme and extending the life of the current Bihar Assembly by 13 months at the other end.  Both reduction of the term of the assembly, or, its extension are profoundly anti-democratic and violate the basic rights of citizens to elect their legislators.

Various strategies are put forth to circumvent the accountability of the executive to the legislature and to ensure fixity of tenure of the House. One of the proposals mooted is that when a no-confidence motion is moved, it must be accompanied by a motion to elect a new leader of the House.  This means that the right of the legislators to vote out a government is circumscribed and conditional to their electing a new government.

The right of elected legislators and members of the Lok Sabha to vote out any government cannot be circumscribed, nor can the right of a ruling party which has a stable majority in the House to recommend dissolution of the House and hold early elections be also curtailed. 

India is a vast country with political diversity and only a federal set-up can sustain political democracy.  Having elections in states at different times is one element of the federal system. 

  The concept of holding simultaneous election by tampering with the Constitution will only foster centralised authoritarianism.  This must be resolutely opposed. 


Impeachment, My Lord!

The impeachment motion moved by opposition parties is an inevitable attempt to resolve the serious issues raised by four senior most judges. The Constitution allows for such a parliamentary scrutiny when things in judiciary go wrong. The..


Challenges before Kodandaram’s TJS

Yet another political party descended on the Telangana political horizon with Prof. Kodandaram transforming the Telangana Joint Action Committee (TJAC) into Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS). But, challenges galore for the professor turned..


Hacking Democracy with Big Data, Fake News and Big Money

STARTING with the Channel 4 exposé of Cambridge Analytica, and now the NaMo app that sends data to, we are beginning to realise the impact of big data on elections. If we combine this with fake news – the recent MIT report that..


Interference of the Government in the Judicial appointments

The nation is concerned with the latest developments arising from the letter written by the Senior most  Judge of the Supreme Court and Second ranking Judge of the Supreme Court's Collegium about interference of the Government in the Judicial..


Jagan’s Resignations Salvo to irk Chandrababu

YSR Congress announced that its MPs would resign on the last day of parliament session if the no-confidence motion is not taken up and special status is thus denied again. The party is exerting pressure on TDP to also seek the resignation of..


Whither fighting BJP in its idiom

Mamata Banerjee's new-found interest in Rama Navami celebrations, and Congress president's unending visits to temples indicate opposition’s desperation to take on Narendra Modi in 2019 by countering BJP's politics of Hindutva, with either..


Jittery BJP makes 3 Goof Ups

The Congress poked fun at Amit Shah saying it agreed with his description of Karnataka's Yeddyurappa government as "number one" in corruption in a gleeful reference to a gaffe made by the BJP president when he sought to mention Siddaramaiah but..


UP Formula  of vote pooling to defeat BJP

THE BJP has suffered a shock defeat in the two by-elections to the Lok Sabha seats of Gorakhpur and Phulpur. In the 2014 Lok Sabha election, these two seats were won by Yogi Adityanath, now chief minister and Keshav Prasad Maurya, now deputy..